- be clear and concise
- refer your points to the page numbers or specific sections in the plan
- say whether you agree or disagree with any or all of the management objectives and strategies – clearly state your reasons, particularly if you disagree
- give sources of information where possible
- suggest alternatives for those aspects of the plan with which you disagree.
The management plans will be reviewed in light of the submissions according to the criteria outlined below. A summary of public submissions will be made available along with the final management plans.
The management plan may be amended if a submission:
- provides additional information of direct relevance to management
- indicates a change in (or clarifies) government legislation or management policy
- proposes strategies that would better achieve management objectives
- indicates omissions, inaccuracies or a lack of clarity.
The management plan may not be amended if a submission:
- clearly supports proposals in the plan
- makes general or neutral statements or no change is sought
- refers to issues beyond the scope of the plan
- refers to issues that are already noted within the plan or already taken into consideration during its preparation
- is one among several widely divergent viewpoints received on the topic but the approach in the plan is still considered the best option
- contributes options that are not feasible (generally due to conflict with legislation or government policy)
- is based on unclear or factually incorrect information.